What To Do When Standard Pro-Choice Talking Points Feel Crazy

What do you do when pro-choice talking points feel so stupid or so evil that you don’t even know what to say? I talked in my last blog post about what to do when something is so far beyond the pale that even most pro-choice people would agree with you about it—like if someone actually straight up says it should be legal to kill toddlers to reduce overpopulation. Often if a pro-choice person says something like that, it’s because they feel trapped. So I talked about some strategies for helping them feel safe enough in the conversation to edit what they said if it’s not really what they think.

But there are some things that feel obviously crazy to a lot of pro-life people that don’t feel crazy to a lot of pro-choice people. If the pro-choice person you’re talking with says one of those things, it’s probably not because they feel trapped, but just because it just genuinely doesn’t feel obvious to them the way it does to you.

For example, let’s take a close look at “I know it’s a human being, I just don’t care.” Not every pro-choice person would agree with that (and many wouldn’t put it quite that starkly), but a lot of pro-choice people agree that a fetus is a living human organism, and some will even grant at least for the sake of argument that fetuses are people with equal rights, and they still think abortion should be legal. What’s happening when a pro-choice person says that?

Step 1: Clarify

Step 1 is the same whether you’re dealing with something that feels crazy to most pro-choice people or something that just feels crazy to you—and sometimes it can even help you figure out which of those two buckets you’re dealing with.

If you have lots of dialogue experience and training and you have some guesses about what they might mean, offering multiple plausible, smart options for what they could be saying is a great way to go. It will help reassure them that you’re not trying to straw man them—you genuinely want to understand the smartest version of what they think. But if in the moment you’re genuinely just flabbergasted, you can only think of one thing they might mean, and it sounds genuinely crazy to you, it also works to say something like:

“Do you have more words you can put around that? I want to understand your view accurately, and I’m guessing that the way I’m interpreting that isn’t what you actually mean. What I’m hearing you say is that you know abortion is a horrific human rights violation—that it unjustly kills an innocent person—and you don’t care. But I’m guessing that’s not what you actually mean—can you help me understand you better?”

As you do this, try not to come across as shocked. Fairly or not, pro-life people have a reputation for being sheltered and pearl-clutching. (Think every homeschool stereotype you’ve ever heard.) One really good goal to have in mind as you dialogue is to disrupt the caricature of pro-lifers that the person you’re talking with has in the back of their head. I don’t mean you shouldn’t be deeply grieved by abortion. And once you’ve built up enough rapport in a conversation, it can sometimes be helpful to be transparent about your grief with a pro-choice person. But get to the point where you know enough about what kinds of things pro-choice people tend to think and say that you’re not shocked when you hear them.

Step 2: Have a Map

As you get more dialogue experience and training, one super helpful thing you’ll get more and more able to contribute to the conversation is actually the smartest pro-choice arguments. That may sound counterintuitive—why would you want to make smarter pro-choice arguments? Doesn’t that lose you debate points or something? 

But one thing that happens a lot in abortion conversations, especially with pro-choice people who haven’t thought deeply about their view, is that they say something fuzzy and inarticulate but know that there’s a smart, articulate thought there that they’re reaching for. Often a pro-life person who knows a little bit more about abortion arguments can easily dunk on the fuzzy thing the pro-choice person just said, but that very rarely changes the pro-choice person’s mind (even if you dunk on it gently and kindly). And it actually shouldn’t change their mind—it’s not because they’re being obstinate and closeminded, it’s because on some level they know there’s a smart argument they were trying to express, and you haven’t answered that smart argument yet. If you can help them get to the smartest version of the argument they’re trying to make, then you have a chance to actually answer it, and a much better shot at helping them change their mind.

It’s like having a map of the abortion dialogue in your head. If someone is trying to talk to you about a city and they say “It’s that one with all the movies,” you could make them feel stupid for saying something vague and inarticulate, but that won’t get you very far. Or, you could helpfully say, “Oh, are you thinking of Los Angeles, or maybe Hollywood?” If you can help a pro-choice person get from the fuzzy thing they actually said to the articulate thing they were trying to think of, you’ll be able to have a much more productive conversation.

Step 3: Learn How to Argue for the Obvious

The final skill you need to be able to respond effectively is arguing for the obvious. (For the specific example of arguing that it matters that fetuses are human beings, one really great tool is the Equal Rights Argument.) Usually, if something feels so obvious to you that you don’t even know how to make an argument for it, that’s actually a gap in your own understanding of your view. If you can fill that gap, you’ll be able to meet pro-choice people where they are in a way that can actually help them understand where you’re coming from, and ultimately change more minds and save more lives.


7 Tips for Handling a Forced Political Debate at the Holiday Dinner Table

Author’s note: This is part two of a two-part series on being an effective pro-life advocate at family holiday gatherings. Part one is here: 6 Things Every Pro-Life Advocate Needs to Know Before the Holidays.

Editor’s Note 11/27/24: Political discussions have become more and more heated over the last decade, and Trump’s election for a second presidential term is unlikely to change that for the better. In addition, with Trump’s re-election and the Dobbs decision, conversations about abortion are more likely than ever to get redirected into a political discussion. It’s better to keep a dialogue focused on abortion, regardless of how you feel about US politics, but sometimes (especially if you’re not the one initiating a debate on hot-button issues at the family dinner) you’re going to be stuck along for the ride. The tips in this article remain highly applicable, and Tip #5 has been updated to be more timely.

Estimated reading time: 11 minutes.

7 Tips for Handling a Forced Political Debate at the Holiday Dinner Table

In my first article on this subject, I explained that political discussions with extended family are some of the most complicated dialogue situations to navigate due largely to the power dynamics. I also discussed several reasons why the holiday dinner table is not an ideal time or place for persuading people to change their mind about abortion.

But what if your pro-choice aunt does bring up abortion or another political topic at the dinner table and tries to pull you into a debate with her? Here are seven tips for making the best of that situation:

7 Things Every Pro-Life Advocate Needs to Know Before the Holidays

Author’s note: This is part one of a two-part series on being an effective pro-life advocate over the holidays.

Editor’s Note 11/27/24: This article has been updated with a new section, listed as #6.

Estimated reading time: 14 minutes.

6 Things Every Pro-Life Advocate Needs to Know Before the Holidays

I’ve been speaking about relational apologetics more often lately, a phrase that I define as “cultivating relationships with people who have different beliefs, for the sake of genuine friendship and for discovering truth together.” One of the most frequent questions I get asked after discussing this topic is how to handle potentially volatile political discussions with family members, such as in the context of a big family dinner at Thanksgiving or Christmas. Even Saturday Night Live has made light of how politically charged Thanksgiving dinners can become:

As my colleague Rachel Crawford noted during a discussion of relational apologetics that we recorded for the Equipped for Life Course Podcast:

I think that a large part of long-term apologetics is going to be coming from what sort of relationship you have with the other person. . . . Having relational apologetics with a family member, especially if they are your mother or your grandmother and they are not a peer, that is going to be especially difficult. . . . that poses an extra challenge.

Family members present several challenges that may make engaging in discourse with them particularly  difficult if you want to be persuasive. I’d like to explain why that is and offer several practical tips for optimizing your chances of changing people’s minds in this context.

Here are six things to keep in mind before you arrive at a big family gathering this holiday season:

Four Practical Dialogue Tips from My Conversation with Brent

Estimated reading time: 12 minutes.

I noticed John Paul, one of our volunteers, looked nervous in his conversation with a student in front of our poll table. I walked up and started listening so he could get help if he needed it. John Paul quickly asked me for my take, and I started asking questions to try to figure out what the other student’s view was. “Brent” had signed “Yes” to the question “Should 20-Week Abortions Remain Legal?” I asked:

Tim: Why do you think 20-week abortions should be legal?

Brent: It’s a woman’s right to live her life the way she wants to.

Tim: Do you think there should be any restrictions on abortion at all? What do you think of, say, a 35-week abortion?

Brent: Oh I’m definitely opposed to 35-week abortions.

Tim: You are? Aren’t you restricting women’s rights to live their lives the way they want to?

Practical Dialogue Tip #1: Turn the Tables on Pro-Choice Rhetoric

 

Picture: Tim's conversation with Brent where these dialogue tips came from.

A great deal of pro-choice rhetoric uses the kind of language that does not very naturally allow room for any restrictions on abortion. For example, any bodily rights rhetoric is going to suffer from this problem. For instance, you can’t say “my body, my choice” to only justify early abortions, because late-term fetuses are still located in her body. In order to justify early abortion without justifying late abortion, you need to argue that the late-term fetus is more valuable than the early-term fetus.

When I notice these kinds of rhetorical mistakes, I will frequently “turn the tables” on them in a gracious way. This is often an extremely weird experience for the pro-choice person because they’re used to the rhetorical power of “my body, my choice” working in their favor, and all of a sudden they find themselves having to argue against it. This tactic would work very well in debates, but that isn’t how I use it. Rather than merely trying to score rhetorical points, I’m hoping to accomplish two things:

  1. I want to help the pro-choice person learn to think more clearly about their rhetoric. It often is not nearly as powerful as they feel like it is, and making them answer the same rhetoric can help them to understand this.
  2. I want to force them to clarify their position. Dialogues only improve when arguments become more clear, and encountering this kind of inconsistency in their position forces people to either shift to an argument with more substance or clarify why they think their rhetoric doesn’t work against their own view.

Brent: No, because before 20 weeks, the fetus isn’t viable.

Tim: You’re right about that. I’m trying to understand your view so help me out here. Why do you think viability is important?