ERI LIVE: What Should I Say in a Post-Roe America?

Download MP3 – 2:44:29

The days after Roe v. Wade’s overturning have been riddled with confusion, panic, anger, protests, and misinformation. There has never been a more important time for pro-life advocates to provide clarity, explain what overturning Roe v. Wade really means, and describe how we want to see our society move forward. Josh, Emily, and Andrew went live on YouTube and Facebook to help you think clearly and respond effectively to the most contentious issue of the moment.

After summarizing what the Dobbs decision did, the staff pull the curtain back on what their experience was like on the day that Dobbs came out, and their emotional reactions to the situation since.

Then they discuss the question of whether pro-lifers should be even trying to get into dialogues right now, given the heated emotions right now.

Finally they respond to these common pro-choice arguments right now:

  • Back-alley abortions
  • Pro-lifers don’t care about babies after they’re born
  • Handmaid’s Tale
  • “This is a step back 50 years for women’s rights”
  • “People will still get abortions anyway!”
  • “You’re going to force women to die from tubal pregnancies. Are doctors really not allowed to do live-saving procedures?”
  • The maternal mortality rate in Mississippi
  • “Justice Thomas’ concurrence proves that they’re coming after same-sex marriage and birth control next!”
  • “You can’t force people to donate organs. Women have less bodily autonomy than corpses now.”
  • “You want to throw women into jail.”
  • “Women will be prosecuted for miscarriages.”

Finally the staff discuss the three steps for the pro-life movement now before taking questions from the audience.

Dobbs Court Overturns Roe v. Wade: What Now for the Pro-Life Movement?

The Supreme Court has officially ruled, in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, to overrule its holdings in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. States are now free to pass laws banning or restricting abortion for the first time in almost 50 years. Millions of hours of work and activism have led to this moment, and it’s a pro-life victory worth celebrating.

But the work of the pro-life movement isn’t over just because Roe has been overturned. In this video, Josh Brahm explains the three primary tasks facing the pro-life movement in this new, post-Roe world, and he concludes with an admonition to pro-life people to celebrate this victory graciously and without confusing it for the finish line.

Welcome Joshua Head!

Please help us welcome Joshua Head to the ERI team as our new Video Editor / Coach!

Joshua Head

After serving as Co-President of the pro-life groups at both Johns Hopkins University and St. Olaf College, Joshua takes great excitement in sharing what he has learned from his experiences and helps current college students create a culture of life at their own respective institutions. For over three years, Joshua has taught the ERI method to numerous audiences of varying age groups and can attest to its effectiveness. Multiple students of his have lauded the results that they have seen on campus, including some who have seen pro-choice students change their minds about the issue right in front of them.

As a video editor, Joshua assists with the editing of ERI videos, podcasts, and courses, and has two years of prior experience editing interviews and other creative projects as well. He’ll also be using his experience to coach at least one of ERI’s Affiliate Groups.

Joshua holds a Master of Music in Viola Performance from the Peabody Institute of the Johns Hopkins University and a Bachelor of Music in Viola Performance (Summa Cum Laude) from St. Olaf College.

Firebombings and Vandalism: Planned Parenthood Must Condemn Jane’s Revenge

Author’s Note – June 29, 2022: I’m happy to report that 53 days after the vandalism began and after multiple tweets from us and others calling for Planned Parenthood to condemn it, they finally did. On June 24, the day that Roe and Casey were overturned and the day that Jane’s Revenge threatened a “night of rage,” Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice America, and the Liberate Abortion Campaign released a joint statement that began by saying:

We reject the tactics and threats of groups that use destruction and violence as a means to an end. They do not speak for us, our supporters, our communities, or our movement. We are committed to protecting and expanding access to abortion and reproductive freedoms through peaceful, non-violent organizing and activism.

I applaud them for finally doing the right thing. Unfortunately, the rest of the statement was awful, focusing on how pro-lifers are typically the violent ones and that groups like ours don’t really care about violence, that we instead just want to score political points. (For the record, political points are not at all the reason we started shining a light on Jane’s Revenge and the lack of response from groups like Planned Parenthood.) If anything, some of the Jane’s Revenge extremists may read into the rest of Planned Parenthood’s statement a defense of what they’re doing. Either way, much of the good of the beginning of the statement was reduced by the rest of it, and if pro-life organizations released analogous statements when violence happens at abortion facilities, you better believe there’d be an outcry.

Having said that, Planned Parenthood finally, and technically, did the thing we called on them to do, and therefore we feel obligated to update this post with that information. It shouldn’t have taken 53 days, but we’re glad that they finally said something against vandalism.

Author’s Note – June 16, 2022: I’ve just become aware that Sarah Stoesz, the president and CEO of Planned Parenthood North Central States, called the attack on the Agape PRC in Des Moines “completely unacceptable.” Her full comment is: “We strongly condemn violence in all of its forms,” she said. “That is not to say that we agree with the mission of crisis pregnancy centers. We absolutely do not, but responding to them with violence is unacceptable.” We commend Sarah Stoesz for that condemnation of the violence. We wish the national Planned Parenthood accounts would do the same, and hopefully they will soon.

This is DAY 39 since the first firebombing of a pro-life office in Madison, WI. There have been at least 3 other firebombings and at least 37 other incidents of vandalism since May 2nd. Planned Parenthood has yet to condemn any of this. And yet, on May 31st Planned Parenthood tweeted in memory of Dr. George Tiller, an abortion practitioner who was murdered 13 years ago. We agree that Dr. Tiller should not have been murdered, and ERI—along with basically every pro-life organization—openly condemned this along with all other violence by people who claim the pro-life position. But by the time Planned Parenthood posted this, there had already been 31 incidents of firebombing and vandalism of pregnancy resource centers, pro-life offices, and churches, the majority of which were done by pro-choice domestic terrorist group Jane’s Revenge. As pro-lifers, we are against this violence: all of this violence. Planned Parenthood: do you condemn this, or are you only against violence done to your side? You’ll condemn the killing of George Tiller, but you won’t condemn firebombings and vandalism against pro-lifers, and you won’t condemn an attempted murder of Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh?

(@LilaGraceRose/Image via Twitter)

Estimated reading time: 2 minutes