Should We Care Whether Abortion Affects Fertility and Future Pregnancy Outcomes?

Does induced abortion affect future fertility and pregnancy complications? This question often cannot be answered without individuals, perhaps even inadvertently, wading into political commentary on abortion. Answers are often clouded by political agendas and funding sources, and co-opted and spun by either side of the abortion debate to push their own narrative.

On the pro-life side, I’ve sometimes seen the affects of abortion on fertility talked about like a horror story, showcasing a uterine perforation or the need for a hysterectomy because of a botched abortion, with nary a citation to help understand how often these outcomes happen. I’ve also experienced pro-life people unable to explain how, exactly, abortion can effect fertility. Talking about how bad abortion is for women can come across as a fear-mongering tactic in these kinds of situations and can make pro-life people seem ignorant. 

On the other side, you have pro-choice people who will outright deny abortion does any harm at all to women’s fertility or that it can affect future pregnancies. You’ll see them hail how safe abortion is and how rare complications are, often with a decontextualized citation, or claim that it’s irrelevant because abortion is safer than childbirth (which isn’t true, by the way). They can come across as blasé in their total denial, making abortion sound too good to be true. 

So…should we care about the answer to this question? What is the answer, and what should be done about it? 

Woman laying in hospital bed with fetal monitor on

Estimated reading time: 12 minutes

AHA: The Anti-Abortionists Who Fight Other Pro-Lifers (with Jonathon Van Maren – Part 1)

Download MP3 – 56:54

Jonathon Van Maren joins the podcast to discuss what is going on with a hostile anti-abortion group called Abolish Human Abortion (AHA). This is the first of a two-part series. In this episode, Jonathon discusses AHA’s origin, their slander of the pro-life movement, how they are not William Wilberforce-style abolitionists, and how they’re attempting to rewrite their history now.

Related Links:

Josh Brahm: AHA Attacks Justice For All for “Not Treating Abortion Like Sin”

Jonathon Van Maren: How “Abolish Human Abortion” Gets History Wrong – Part 1:

Jonathon Van Maren: How “Abolish Human Abortion” Gets History Wrong Again – Part 2:

Debate: Pro-Life Incrementalism vs Abolitionist Immediatism (Gregg Cunningham vs. T. Russell Hunter)
https://youtu.be/5oi4vVTae30

We referenced Dr. Michael New’s research on the effects of pro-life legislation. While much of his work is behind various paywalls, he helpfully sent a link to a 2018 policy analysis he wrote for the Charlotte Lozier Institute, where he summarized the academic research on the impact of pro-life laws:

Chapters:

  • 00:00 Introduction
  • 00:40 Josh on the pro-life unity happening in this episode
  • 02:22 Why we’re talking about AHA
  • 08:16 AHA’s origin
  • 27:00 The difference between critiquing in good faith and bad faith
  • 31:21 Problems with AHA-supported legislation
  • 32:49 Pro-life victories and AHA’s slander
  • 37:48 Why are abortion rates down?
  • 39:23 Straw-manning or unintelligent?
  • 40:38 “And then what?”
  • 42:08 They’re not Wilberforce-style abolitionists

Jonathon Van Maren is the Communications Director for the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform. His writings have been translated into more than six languages, and published in the National Post, National Review, First Things, The European Conservative, The Federalist, The American Conservative, The Stream, the Jewish Independent, the Hamilton Spectator, Reformed Perspective Magazine, among others. His insights have been featured on CTV, Global News, and the CBC, as well as over twenty radio stations. He regularly speaks on a variety of social issues at universities, high schools, churches, and other functions in Canada, the United States, and Europe.

Arguments about Pro-Life “Hypocrisy” Prove Nothing about Abortion

Masked face holding another mask, hypocrisy

Estimated reading time: 12 minutes

Charges of “pro-life hypocrisy” abound on the internet. Unfortunately, they also exist in professional philosophy journals in the form of “inconsistency arguments.” These take the following form:

         P1: Were pro-life people consistent, they would X.

         P2: Pro-life people fail to X.

         C: Therefore, pro-life people are inconsistent.

Accompanying such arguments is an implicit understanding or explicit assertion that if the pro-life person does not change her beliefs or behaviors in order to be consistent, then her continued inconsistency counts as hypocrisy.

Dealing with a Hostile Campus as a Pro-Life Club

Download MP3 – 1:20:27

Emily pulls back the curtain to explain the ways that her pro-life club leaders overcame hostility, established a good working relationship with their college administrators, dealt with vandalism, connected with the pro-choice club, and more! Even if the campus is a hostile environment, students can take proactive steps to engage in successful pro-life activism.

Chapters

  • 00:00 Introduction
  • 01:50 Coaching other clubs
  • 04:05 Managing a club’s image
  • 07:03 Dealing with vandalism
  • 29:15 The importance of outreach
  • 30:42 Campus rules for outreach
  • 46:13 Explaining why you do outreach
  • 47:27 Be transparent
  • 54:34 The pro-choice club on campus
  • 1:13:01 When in doubt…
  • 1:18:17 If a club wants advice…

Related Links:

Email Emily at:
Emily@EqualRightsInstitute.com

How One Club Changed Their Campus (Extended Interview with Emily Albrecht)
https://youtu.be/HoSwkt1wFdY

Emily’s First Outreach Mistakes
https://youtu.be/jP-gL9ZmafU

Emily’s First Dialogue Mistakes
https://youtu.be/u5hVXb0ikcI

Here’s the meme Josh referenced toward the end:
Trying Kombucha for the First Time

Equal Rights Institute Website:
https://EqualRightsInstitute.com

Equal Rights Institute Blog:
https://Blog.EqualRightsInstitute.com

How to Find Underlying Assumptions in Dialogue about Abortion

Pro-choice people often bring underlying assumptions to the table when discussing abortion. Most of the time, while these assumptions play an important part in how they justify their position, they won’t say them out loud and may not even be able to articulate them. If we don’t reveal and confront these hidden premises in our conversations about abortion, we have a much smaller chance of getting a pro-choice person to think differently about abortion. 

People looking at underside of bridge

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes