MP3 Download | 1:33:06
Josh Brahm and Monica Snyder have an open conversation about biology, philosophy, and how they interact with persuasion in the abortion debate. Monica has a STEM background so she and Josh compare notes on how STEM professionals and philosophers feel about each other, and why many of them are arrogant.
They also discuss:
– How arrogance, confidence, and impostor syndrome often interact with each other;
– The pros and cons of using big words; – Whether biology vs. philosophy are more likely to change minds on abortion;
– “Should we prioritize our arguments more based on whether they are influential, emotionally compelling, logically sound, or other factors?”
– Steps anyone can take to become more rational.
Related Links:
Secular Pro-Life: https://SecularProLife.org
SPL posts about changing from PC to PL: https://secularprolife.com/becomingpr…
SPL’s “No. embryos aren’t parasites” video: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=546…
ERI’s article “Abortion Images: A Case for Disagreement without Division” http://bit.ly/2uJWRcI
Equal Rights Institute Website: https://EqualRightsInstitute.com
Equal Rights Institute Blog: https://Blog.EqualRightsInstitute.com
Equipped for Life Course: https://EquippedCourse.com
Sidewalk Counseling Masterclass: http://SidewalkCounselingMasterclass.com
Please note: The goal of the comments section on this blog is simply and unambiguously to promote productive dialogue. We reserve the right to delete comments that are snarky, disrespectful, flagrantly uncharitable, offensive, or off-topic. If in doubt, read our Comments Policy.