Download MP3 – 56:54
Jonathon Van Maren joins the podcast to discuss what is going on with a hostile anti-abortion group called Abolish Human Abortion (AHA). This is the first of a two-part series. In this episode, Jonathon discusses AHA’s origin, their slander of the pro-life movement, how they are not William Wilberforce-style abolitionists, and how they’re attempting to rewrite their history now.
Josh Brahm: AHA Attacks Justice For All for “Not Treating Abortion Like Sin”
Jonathon Van Maren: How “Abolish Human Abortion” Gets History Wrong – Part 1:
Jonathon Van Maren: How “Abolish Human Abortion” Gets History Wrong Again – Part 2:
Debate: Pro-Life Incrementalism vs Abolitionist Immediatism (Gregg Cunningham vs. T. Russell Hunter)
We referenced Dr. Michael New’s research on the effects of pro-life legislation. While much of his work is behind various paywalls, he helpfully sent a link to a 2018 policy analysis he wrote for the Charlotte Lozier Institute, where he summarized the academic research on the impact of pro-life laws:
- 00:00 Introduction
- 00:40 Josh on the pro-life unity happening in this episode
- 02:22 Why we’re talking about AHA
- 08:16 AHA’s origin
- 27:00 The difference between critiquing in good faith and bad faith
- 31:21 Problems with AHA-supported legislation
- 32:49 Pro-life victories and AHA’s slander
- 37:48 Why are abortion rates down?
- 39:23 Straw-manning or unintelligent?
- 40:38 “And then what?”
- 42:08 They’re not Wilberforce-style abolitionists
Jonathon Van Maren is the Communications Director for the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform. His writings have been translated into more than six languages, and published in the National Post, National Review, First Things, The European Conservative, The Federalist, The American Conservative, The Stream, the Jewish Independent, the Hamilton Spectator, Reformed Perspective Magazine, among others. His insights have been featured on CTV, Global News, and the CBC, as well as over twenty radio stations. He regularly speaks on a variety of social issues at universities, high schools, churches, and other functions in Canada, the United States, and Europe.
Please note: The goal of the comments section on this blog is simply and unambiguously to promote productive dialogue. We reserve the right to delete comments that are snarky, disrespectful, flagrantly uncharitable, offensive, or off-topic. If in doubt, read our Comments Policy.